Application Security

Find the bugs scanners can't see.

Manual code review by senior application security engineers. Business logic flaws, crypto misuse, auth vulnerabilities — the things SAST tools miss.

What's included

Secure Code Review

Manual + automated

SAST tools find low-hanging fruit. We find business logic flaws, crypto misuse, race conditions — issues that require understanding context.

Language expertise

Java, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, C#, Rust, PHP — we have engineers who've written production code in your stack.

Vulnerability classes covered

Injection, auth bypass, crypto, deserialization, race conditions, SSRF, XXE, and business logic issues across OWASP and SANS Top 25.

Developer-friendly findings

Reports written for engineers, with code-level fixes — not 'consider implementing input validation' platitudes.

Methodology

How we work.

01

Scoping

Identify high-risk components — auth, payment, data access, file handling. Prioritize based on risk and complexity.

02

Threat modeling

Build threat model for in-scope components. Define attack surfaces, trust boundaries, and security objectives.

03

Automated scanning

Run SAST tools (Semgrep, CodeQL, Snyk) for baseline. Tune to your codebase to reduce false positives.

04

Manual review

Senior engineers manually review high-risk code paths, looking for business logic flaws and context-specific issues.

05

Reporting & re-review

Findings report with code-level fixes. Developer briefing. Free re-review after remediation.

Deliverables

What you get.

  • Comprehensive findings report with severity and CVSS
  • Code-level fix recommendations with diff examples
  • SAST tool tuning configuration for your codebase
  • Threat model document for reviewed components
  • Developer briefing session
  • Free re-review of fixed findings
Ideal for

Best fit.

  • Companies pre-launch or pre-major-release of critical features
  • Fintech and healthtech handling sensitive data
  • Organizations adopting new languages or frameworks
  • Companies that have only relied on SAST tools and want deeper coverage
Pricing

Starting at TBD

TBD
Up to 50,000 lines of code (more available)
Automated SAST scanning and tuning
Manual review of high-risk components
Threat model document
Findings report with code-level fixes
Free re-review within 60 days

Final pricing depends on scope, asset count, and complexity. We provide a detailed breakdown before engagement.

FAQ

Code Review questions.

Java, Python, Go, Node.js/TypeScript, Ruby, C#/.NET, Rust, PHP, Kotlin, Swift. Other languages on request.

Only the components in scope. We work in isolated environments, sign NDAs, and follow your security requirements.

VAPT tests the running application from outside. Code review examines the source code. Code review finds issues that aren't reachable in testing — and finds the root cause faster.

Yes — we can deploy SAST tooling integrated with your pipeline as a follow-on engagement.

Related

Often paired with.

Next step

Get your Code Review proposal.

30-minute discovery call — scoped proposal within 48 hours.